<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Game Development on OliverBrown.me.uk</title>
		<link>https://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/tags/game-development/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Game Development on OliverBrown.me.uk</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/tags/game-development/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>MonoGame is going strong</title>
				<link>https://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2026/08/20/monogame-is-going-strong/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2026/08/20/monogame-is-going-strong/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;When I recently started looking at &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2026/07/30/gravitas-updated-to-.net-10-and-monogame-3.8.5/&#34;&gt;getting Gravitas working again with MonoGame&lt;/a&gt;, I was concerned about whether MonoGame was still maintained. After all, I &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2012/02/12/gravitas-in-final-review/&#34;&gt;first got Gravitas working in MonoGame&lt;/a&gt; 14 years ago.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Apparently, not only is it still maintained, but I honestly think it is doing better now than when I first paid attention to it. So this is me doing my part to demonstrate continued community interest where I can.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
