<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OliverBrown.me.uk &#187; Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/category/technology/computers/blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:08:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Look &#8211; New Features</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2009/09/16/new-look-new-features/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2009/09/16/new-look-new-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/?p=568</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally decided to start posting to my blog with some regularity again. Whether it will last, I can&#8217;t say. As part of the relaunch I&#8217;ve finally upgraded WordPress to a more respectable (and secure) version, found a new theme and added some cool stuff, including OpenID support for comment posting. All the posts and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally decided to start posting to my blog with some regularity again. Whether it will last, I can&#8217;t say.</p>
<p>As part of the relaunch I&#8217;ve finally upgraded WordPress to a more  respectable (and secure) version, found a new theme and added some cool stuff, including OpenID support for comment posting.</p>
<p>All the posts and comments should be intact and everything should be working properly, but random behaviour for the next few days shouldn&#8217;t be unexpected&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2009/09/16/new-look-new-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Getting paid to review</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/14/getting-paid-to-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/14/getting-paid-to-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPerPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ReviewMe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TextLinkAds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/14/getting-paid-to-review/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well it seems that PayPerPost isn&#8217;t unique as a few other people are jumping on the bandwagon. One of the notable ones is ReviewMe from the people at TextLinkAds. Although the theory is essentially the same as PayPerPost, the implementation is different. In PPP advertisers list opportunities which bloggers can the accept. The price paid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it seems that <a href="http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/03/payperpost-is-getting-a-lot-of-flak/">PayPerPost</a> isn&#8217;t unique as a few other people are jumping on the bandwagon. One of the notable ones is <a href="http://www.reviewme.com/">ReviewMe</a> from the people at <a href="http://www.text-link-ads.com/">TextLinkAds</a>.</p>
<p>Although the theory is essentially the same as PayPerPost, the implementation is different. In PPP advertisers list opportunities which bloggers can the accept. The price paid ranges from about $2.50 to $10 (with the most common being $4 or $5). ReviewMe works the other way round. Bloggers list their blogs with a price (determined by ReviewMe) and advertisers choose which ones they want to review their product or service. The price paid is dependent on the blog (how exactly they determine I&#8217;m not sure but it seems to be some sort of PageRank, Alexa, back-links type combination) and seems to be significantly higher. Of course you&#8217;re likely to get fewer offers though.</p>
<p>One offer they seem to be giving to everyone is to review ReviewMe itself (eerily like this) so every blogger accepted should earn something from them. And although I didn&#8217;t look at their payout details specifically, I would guess it&#8217;s the same as TextLinkAds &#8211; at the end of the month by PayPal with no minimum (and possibly other options with a minimum or a fee).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/14/getting-paid-to-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to get more visitors to old content</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/13/how-to-get-more-visitors-to-old-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/13/how-to-get-more-visitors-to-old-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/10/28/how-to-get-more-visitors-to-old-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the main advantages of blogs as a publishing medium is also a big disadvantage at times &#8211; the time sensitive nature. The fact that the information is about as up to the minute as you can get (in general) means blogs are a better source of news (or more importantly opinions about news) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the main advantages of blogs as a publishing medium is also a big disadvantage at times &#8211; the time sensitive nature. The fact that the information is about as up to the minute as you can get (in general) means blogs are a better source of news (or more importantly opinions about news) than search engine results for instance. But this means that some of your content can be come rather pointless after a short time.</p>
<p>Some articles are essentially timeless however. If you&#8217;re lucky and lots of people link to them you should be able to get some steady search engine traffic but people looking for something that specific aren&#8217;t likely to hang around after reading them. So <a href="http://www.feedcycle.com">FeedCycle.com</a> have come up with a reasonably clever way of letting you push your old content but still keeping a blogesque feel to it.</p>
<p>The idea is to create a custom feed of a subsection of your content. The example they push a lot is a podcast &#8220;series&#8221; about the same topic, but it can be any thematically linked (and generally ordered) series of posts from your blog. When someone subscribes they get the first post in the series. The next day, they get the next post and so on until the end of the series.</p>
<p>There is a plug-in somewhere for WordPress that lets you mark posts as part of a series and to create navigation links to quickly get between them. Used in conjunction with this would let your users read through the whole series or just sit back and have it delivered. Now if only I ever posted such a series&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/13/how-to-get-more-visitors-to-old-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christian Debt Consolidation</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/05/christian-debt-consolidation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/05/christian-debt-consolidation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian debt consolidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPerPost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/05/christian-debt-consolidation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blog-wise amongst you may have noticed the disclosure policy page and the PayPerPost post and put two and two together. Anyone who has no idea what that sentence means (and what it might have to do with Christian debt consolidation), just relax and trust that all is well. Now I&#8217;ve decided to muddy the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The blog-wise amongst you may have noticed the disclosure policy page and the <a href="http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/03/payperpost-is-getting-a-lot-of-flak/">PayPerPost</a> post and put two and two together. Anyone who has no idea what that sentence means (and what it might have to do with Christian debt consolidation), just relax and trust that all is well.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;ve decided to muddy the waters a little with regards to PayPerPost in a sort of confusing double bluff sort of way. Most of the opportunities on PayPerPost are almost impossible to post in a subtle way. Some on the other hand are fairly sensible, except for the fact that they want &#8220;buzz&#8221; (over the top praise for their service) meaning they aren&#8217;t suitable for most people either. So I&#8217;ve decided to be honest. That doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m necessarily going to be open about what is or isn&#8217;t PayPerPost motivated. But bear in mind that I doubt really negative (or at least sarcastic) reviews will get paid.</p>
<p>And that brings us back to <a href="http://www.christiandebthelp.info/">Christian debt consolidation</a>. That site I have emblazoned with a link has some, er, &#8220;resources&#8221; regarding christian debt help. Those resources are Google Ads. Five keyword heavy pages about the advantages of Christian debt consolidation and why Christian debt consolidation is better than secular debt consolidation (atheist debt consolidation?) and three ads units per page. The irony for me at least is the obvious American slant &#8211; none of the adverts I see mention Christian at all. We don&#8217;t really have a strong religious right wing over here so marketing things as specifically Christian doesn&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>And if you get there by mistake they have some handy links about timeshares, cord blood and student loans. We&#8217;re talking A-grade top quality content here folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/05/christian-debt-consolidation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PayPerPost is getting a lot of flak</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/03/payperpost-is-getting-a-lot-of-flak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/03/payperpost-is-getting-a-lot-of-flak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orbwars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PayPerPost]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/10/29/payperpost-is-getting-a-lot-of-flak/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PayPerPost are a fairly new company offering yet another revenue stream for bloggers (although for most blogs the existing ones probably aren&#8217;t earth shattering). This one&#8217;s a lot more controversial on the surface however. You get paid to write content about something specific. And you get paid quite a lot (at least in blogging revenue [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.payperpost.com">PayPerPost</a> are a fairly new company offering yet another revenue stream for bloggers (although for most blogs the existing ones probably aren&#8217;t earth shattering). This one&#8217;s a lot more controversial on the surface however. You get paid to write content about something specific. And you get paid quite a lot (at least in blogging revenue terms), usually about $5 per post.</p>
<p>It has however pissed quite a few people off. <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2006/10/05/mike-arringtons-best-moment-making-payperpost-look-like-the-lo/">Jason, CEO of Weblogs</a> seems to be one of the loudest. I&#8217;m going to take the wimpy way out and simply say it&#8217;s a tool with potential, that can be abused.</p>
<p>But in the long that&#8217;s not a problem for the blogosphere. If you destroy your own integrity by blatantly posting ads instead of actual content you will lose out as surely as if you filled the page with conventional advertising. If you don&#8217;t annoy your readers however, you will be fine. In this case it means choosing &#8220;opportunities&#8221; (that&#8217;s what PPP call them) that are actually relevant. That&#8217;s how Google AdSense came to be accepted, remember?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/11/03/payperpost-is-getting-a-lot-of-flak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Performancing.com &#8211; Ads for Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/10/18/performancingcom-ads-for-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/10/18/performancingcom-ads-for-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 18:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Performancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/10/18/performancingcom-ads-for-bloggers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Performancing.com have just launched a new ad network type thing for bloggers. Ads are sold per blog for a flat fee per month and you get 70% of total revenue. Could be quite good&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://performancing.com/partners">Performancing.com</a> have just launched a new ad network type thing for bloggers. Ads are sold per blog for a flat fee per month and you get 70% of total revenue. Could be quite good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/10/18/performancingcom-ads-for-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux is neither popular nor valuable</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/07/24/linux-is-neither-popular-but-valuable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/07/24/linux-is-neither-popular-but-valuable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/07/24/linux-is-neither-popular-but-valuable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controversial statement? Well that&#8217;s the point. There is a hilarious article over at XML.com about the traffic advantages of controversy on blogs. The funniest part of course is the number of comments from people who read the title of the post but not the content and just threw a normal anti-anti Linux rant. Unfortunately these [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Controversial statement? Well that&#8217;s the point. There is a <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2006/07/linux_sucks_apple_sucks_and_po.html">hilarious article over at XML.com</a> about the traffic advantages of controversy on blogs.</p>
<p>The funniest part of course is the number of comments from people who read the title of the post but not the content and just threw a normal anti-anti Linux rant.</p>
<p>Unfortunately these things only work if you have a fair amount of traffic in the first place and I probably don&#8217;t quite qualify <img src='http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><tags>Linux, traffic, Linux sucks</tags></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/07/24/linux-is-neither-popular-but-valuable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No more outages</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/07/06/no-more-outages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/07/06/no-more-outages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/07/06/no-more-outages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><![CDATA[Some of you may have noticed the blog being down regularly. Well I haven't fixed it yet. But I finally got <a href="http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/05/10/i-wrote-a-bash-script/">the script</a> to work that was supposed to restart it. I eventually diagnosed the problem as an incorrect <code>path</code> setting for the cron daemon.</p>
<p>Anyway, it should now never be down for more than a few minutes&#8230;</p>
<p><tags>bash, Linux, servers</tags>]]&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/07/06/no-more-outages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdSense baiting</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/06/04/adsense-baiting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/06/04/adsense-baiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2006 08:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/06/04/adsense-baiting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[interesting deal from Lloyd&#8217;s TSB. So I wondered if I could make more appear by mentioning things likes loans, finance and mortgages. Just mentioning loans once isn&#8217;t going to do it so I should mention loans a few times. A stray mention of debt management might also help. Of course my demographic isn&#8217;t really geared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><![CDATA[Some adverts for loans appeared recently, probably because I mentioned an <a href="http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/05/26/lloyds-tsb-interest-not-as-good-as-it-sounds/">interesting deal from Lloyd&#8217;s TSB</a>. So I wondered if I could make more appear by mentioning things likes loans, finance and mortgages.</p>
<p>Just mentioning loans once isn&#8217;t going to do it so I should mention loans a few times. A stray mention of debt management might also help.</p>
<p>Of course my demographic isn&#8217;t really geared towards finance topics like loans or money lending. So just think of this as an experiment.</p>
<p><tags>loans, mortgages, finance, credit, money, AdSense</tags>]]&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/06/04/adsense-baiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even simpler searching</title>
		<link>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/04/28/even-simpler-searching/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/04/28/even-simpler-searching/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Programming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/04/26/even-simpler-searching/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nicer searching in WordPress one step further. Now if you try to get to a page that doesn&#8217;t exist it automatically redirects to the search page. So http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/galaxia will return search results for &#8220;galaxia&#8221;. If you want to do it yourself, you need to do two things. First you need to redirect error pages to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><![CDATA[I decided to take my idea for <a href="http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2005/11/25/nice-searching-in-wordpress/">nicer searching in WordPress</a> one step further. Now if you try to get to a page that doesn&#8217;t exist it automatically redirects to the search page. So <a href="http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/galaxia">http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/galaxia</a> will return search results for &#8220;galaxia&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you want to do it yourself, you need to do two things. First you need to redirect error pages to a custom PHP page so add the following line to the top of your <code>.htaccess</code> file:</p>
<p><code>ErrorDocument: 404error.php</code></p>
<p>Now you need to create <code>404error.php</code> and make it redirect to the search page by adding the following to it:</p>
<p><code>header('Location: http://' . $_SERVER['HTTP_HOST'] . '/search.php?s=' . $_SERVER['REDIRECT_SCRIPT_URL']);</code></p>
<p>After doing this it had me thinking about status codes. By default that will generate a <code>302 Found</code> HTTP status code. A bit of reading led me to decide that <code>303 See Other</code> was a better response since the request might correspond to a page in the future (and presumably a relevent page) but for now should be redirected. <code>3XX</code> are somewhat confusing&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway if you want that behavious, add this line too:</p>
<p><code>header('Status: 303 See Other');</code></p>
<p>Finally, you should think a little before implementing this since any random page accessed could now be cached by proxy serversand search engines etc. since the server is no longer sending a <code>404 Not Found</code> code.</p>
<p><tags>HTTP, status codes, WordPress</tags>]]&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oliverbrown.me.uk/2006/04/28/even-simpler-searching/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: www.oliverbrown.me.uk @ 2012-02-07 08:30:04 -->
